|
Saturday, 01 November 2008 09:33 |
|
You invest money in an IRA, up to the amounts allowable under the tax law. These investments are termed "contributions." In many instances an income tax deduction is available for the tax year for which the funds are contributed. The contributions, as well as the earnings and gains from these contributions, accumulate tax-free until you withdraw the money from the account. You therefore enjoy the ability to generate additional earnings, unreduced by taxes on these earnings, each year the funds remain within the IRA.
The withdrawals of the funds from the IRA are termed "distributions." Distributions are subject to income taxation, generally in the year in which you receive them. (Remember that in most cases you received an income tax deduction when you contributed the money to the IRA.) As with most things involving the government, the rules for distributions are more complicated than they need to be.
Since the original purpose of the IRA is to assist you in providing for your own retirement, there is a disincentive for withdrawing your IRA funds prior to an assumed retirement age of 59 1/2. This disincentive takes the form of a tax "penalty" in the amount of 10 % of the distributions received by you prior to age 59 1/2, unless certain exceptions apply. Given the complexity of this issue alone, professional advice should be obtained whenever significant amounts of distributions are needed prior to age 59 1/2. The fact is that many times the penalty can be avoided with proper planning. Obviously these distributions, whether before age 59 1/2 or later, are subject to income taxation upon receipt. Once you are age 59 1/2 this penalty, termed a "Premature Distribution" penalty, is no longer applicable.
On the flip side of the government not wanting you to withdraw your money at too young an age, it also has rules to prevent you from not withdrawing the money soon enough. (This is done in order that the government can tax it.) You usually need to begin taking money from your IRA no later than April 1 of the calendar year following the date you attained age 70 1/2. The rules established by the government regarding these Required Minimum Distributions, their timing, the amounts, the recalculations, and the effect various beneficiary designations have on them, are among the most complex of the Internal Revenue Code. The penalty is 50 % of the shortfall between what you should have withdrawn and the amounts you actually withdrew by the proper date. This punitive penalty is matched only by the civil fraud penalty in severity. The necessary calculations are therefore not something that most individuals should attempt on their own. |
|
Saturday, 01 November 2008 09:33 |
|
A. There are five different types of IRA’s:
1. TRADITIONAL IRA
You can contribute up to $2,000 per year into an IRA. The amount of this contribution that is deductible on your income tax return depends on your Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) and whether you are covered under an employer sponsored qualified retirement plan. Thus, depending on your filing status (Single, Joint, etc), and your AGI, your contributions may range from fully deductible to totally non-deductible. So even though you are eligible to contribute to your IRA, you may be in a position where none of these contributions are in fact deductible.
2. EDUCATION IRA
You can put away up to $500 per year into an education IRA, the money grows tax-free and has preferential tax treatment upon distribution to the beneficiary who uses it for authorized education expenses. These plans are not very common in that they are very restrictive on who can make contributions to them, the amount of total contributions allowable each year, and the limitations on what exact education expenses qualify. Your financial planner should be able to assist you in evaluating what savings plan you should undertake to prepare for higher education costs, as well as in reviewing many of the tax-sheltered savings plans now sponsored by the various states, even for benefits of non-state residents.
3. SEP IRA - Simplified Employee Pension
This is an employer established and funded Simplified IRA, where the employer can put up to 15% of your compensation into a special IRA account. Sole proprietors may establish these plans for their own benefit. They are sometimes used instead of Keogh retirement plans because they have fewer administrative and tax filing requirements.
4. SIMPLE IRA
This is a rather new creation, but rapidly becoming more popular. It’s another employer sponsored and administered retirement plan. The attractive features of this plan includes not only the ability for the employer to establish and fund a retirement plan for the benefit of him/herself and his/her employees, but it also permits employees to contribute up to 100 %, but no more than $6,500 per year, into an IRA. Separate rules relative to required employer contributions and premature distributions apply.
5. ROTH IRA
Contributions are NOT deductible when the funds are contributed, but the Roth IRA earnings accumulate tax-free and remain tax-free upon distribution. To be eligible to contribute, your Adjusted Gross Income must be under $95,000 for singles and $150,000 for married couples, as of December 2000. You cannot withdraw your funds within the first 5 years after the establishment of the Roth without a penalty. Given that this 5-year testing period can successfully be addressed by proper tax planning, the establishment and at least partial funding of a Roth IRA account should be on the discussion list of the financial advisor of every taxpayer who qualifies to open such a plan. |
|
Saturday, 01 November 2008 09:33 |
|
ny individual can open and make contributions to a traditional IRA, as long as you, or your spouse (if you file a joint return), received taxable earned compensation during the year and you were not 70 ½ years old by the end of the year. |
|
Saturday, 01 November 2008 09:33 |
|
The IRS first released its proposed regulations for IRAs and other qualified plans in January 2001. The final rules, released April 17, 2002, and effective as of January 1, 2003, generally keep last year's simplifications and add some new elements, incorporating many suggestions that were made after the proposed regulations were released. (However, the section dealing with annuity payments has been substantially changed and was issued as a temporary regulation, giving taxpayers a chance to offer additional feedback.) The final rules make it easier for taxpayers to calculate their required minimum distribution (RMD), and, in general, reduce the resulting amount. This means that people can stretch out their payments - and enjoy the tax shelter - for a longer period of time. The final rules also address a number of aspects related to the designated beneficiary, but here we'll focus on the new rules for RMD calculations.
According to the Federal Register, IRA owners must begin taking an annual RMD from their account on "April 1 of the calendar year following the calendar year in which the [taxpayer] attains age 70 1/2, even if the [person] has not retired" (Vol. 67, No. 74, p. 18988). Taxpayers determine their RMD by dividing their account balance by the appropriate distribution period. The good news is that the distribution period is now based on one uniform table, with an identical distribution period for almost all taxpayers of the same age. The table is based on the combined life expectancy of the individual and a hypothetical beneficiary who is ten years younger. If the sole beneficiary is a spouse who is more than ten years younger, it is possible to use another calculation, instead of the uniform table, which extends the distribution period. Moreover, the new rules include updated life expectancy figures that reflect projected mortality improvement through 2003. The end result is that most taxpayers can use a longer distribution period with a lower annual RMD.
After the individual's death, the RMD is generally calculated using the beneficiary's remaining life expectancy (based on the beneficiary's age in the year after the individual's death, which is reduced by one for each following year). If there is no designated beneficiary, the RMD is based on the individual's life expectancy in the year of death (and reduced by one for each following year).
In the past, RMD calculations were criticized for using too many variables that could change in the individual's life during any given year. This would complicate the calculations by creating different parameters for different times of the year and by making many people unsure how to determine the RMD accurately. In response, the final rules include some additional simplifications. For example, a person's marital status is determined on January 1, regardless of whether divorce or a spouse's death occurs later that year. If the beneficiary changes, due to a spouse's death, any changes in the life expectancy calculations will not come into play until the following year. Also, the account balance of an IRA or other qualified plan is now determined by the balance on the preceding December 31; any contributions or distributions made after that date are disregarded, when computing the RMD for the following year. For example, if on December 31, your IRA balance is $50,000, and you add $2,000 on Jan. 1 of the following year, your RMD calculation is based on the $50,000, not $52,000.
Taxpayers will also be getting additional help in calculating their RMD. The new rules specify that, beginning in 2003, banks, brokers, and other IRA trustees must report the RMD amount to IRA owners or calculate it for them upon request. The trustees are not required to report the RMD to the IRS, but, beginning in 2004, they will have to identify to the IRS each IRA for which an RMD is required. So taxpayers will also have to be extra careful to not miss any required distributions, since the IRS will have a complete report on which IRAs to check.
According to IRS News Release IR 2002-50, dated April 16, 2002, taxpayers have several options for the 2002 tax year regulations. They may use the final 2002 regulations, the 2001 version of the proposed regulations, or the original 1987 version of the proposed regulations.
With all of these options to consider and the complexity of the rules themselves (not withstanding their supposed "simplification"), we highly recommend consulting a qualified tax professional before you need to take any required distributions, and continuing to consult with them on at least an annual basis, as your situation changes and modifications to the rules are released.
Uniform Table - from Federal Register April 17, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 74, p.19012) |
|
Saturday, 01 November 2008 09:33 |
|
he Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 enacted a number of changes to the rules regarding IRAs, 401(k)s, 403(b)s, and other retirement plans. One of the areas affected are contribution limits. However, it is important to remember that a number of the changes are being phased in between 2002 and 2010. Also, the Act does not apply to tax years after 2010. It will be up to Congress to renew or change the law; they may even do so well before 2010.
Traditional and Roth IRAs
Contribution limits for Traditional and Roth IRAs will rise from $2000 to $5,000 between 2002 and 2008. After 2008, the limit may be adjusted annually for inflation.
Tax Year Limit
2002-2004 $3,000
2005-2006 $4,000
2008 $5,000
2009-2010 Indexed to Inflation
401(k), 403(b), and 457 Plans
These limits are on pretax contributions to certain employer- sponsored retirement plans. Remember that employers have the option of imposing lower limits than the government maximums, which will rise to $15,000 by 2006.
Tax Year Limit
2002 $11,000
2003 $12,000
2004 $13,000
2005 $14,000
2006 $15,000
2007-2010 Indexed to Inflation
Catch-Up Contributions
"Catch-up" contributions are for people aged 50 and over, in order to balance out the advantages of increased contributions for younger individuals. To be eligible for a catch-up contribution, an individual must first make the maximum regular contribution to his or her IRA or employer-sponsored plan.
Tax Year Catch-Up Contribution
2002-2005 $500
2006-2010 $1000
Catch-up contributions to Traditional IRAs may be tax deductible if the taxpayer meets certain income restrictions.
SIMPLE
A SIMPLE plan is a retirement planning vehicle for small business owners and employees. There is a catch-up contribution available for SIMPLE plans that will be gradually increased to $2,500 by 2006, and then indexed to inflation for 2007 through 2010.
Tax Year Limit
2002 $7,000
2003 $8,000
2004 $9,000
2005 $10,000
2006 Indexed to inflation
There are many other changes made by the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, the nuances of which may affect your eligibility for various tax benefits. For instance, the tax-deductible portion of the contribution limits may be reduced depending upon your income. The advice of a qualified professional should always be sought before implementing any tax or financial planning strategy. |
|
Saturday, 01 November 2008 09:33 |
|
It depends. First, this does not apply to Roth IRAs; they have different rules. But, for a Traditional IRA, it depends mostly on the amount of taxable compensation you earned in that tax year and whether or not you, or your spouse if married, are an active participant in a qualified plan (click highlighted words for explanation of these terms). Assuming you, or you and your spouse jointly, earned more in taxable compensation than the maximum deductible amount for your IRA contributions, and neither of you are active participants in a qualified plan, you should be eligible to deduct the full amount of your contribution up to the maximum deductible amount.
If you or your spouse is an active participant in a qualified or employer-sponsored plan, then the amount of your contribution that is tax-deductible can be reduced depending on your AGI (adjusted gross income). For example, in 2002, single taxpayers’ deduction starts being reduced at $34,000 AGI, and no part of their contribution is deductible if their AGI is more than $44,000. For jointly filing married couples, the reduction is based on their combined AGI. For 2002, the reduction for them begins at $54,000 AGI, and no part of their contribution is deductible if they earn more than a combined AGI of $64,000. |
|
|